🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to pull out from an global treaty designed to protect women from violence, covering domestic abuse, following prolonged and heated discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in Riga this past week to oppose the vote. The ultimate decision now lies with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to establish laws and assistance programs to end all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a decision that human rights organizations described as a significant setback for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet conservative groups have argued that its focus on equal rights undermines traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided 56 to 32 to exit from the convention, a move sponsored by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the primary political groups advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the organization Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked widespread protest both within the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a Latvian petition calling for the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a protest for the coming week, charging lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a rash choice fueled by false information. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty in 2021, cases of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the head of state could possibly send back the bill for further review if he holds objections.

Head of State the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to legal principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in our nation but across the continent," stated a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse rates have been rising in multiple EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could influence similar debates in additional member states